Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 3:20 PTG | Posted in
Posted: 08 May 2016 06:54 AM PDT
Asbestos Legislation - The potential health risks of asbestos have been known for literally thousands of years – even the ancient Greeks saw that it had an effect on those that worked with it. But for too long, the governments of the United States and many other countries opted not to act to stop the use of asbestos in construction, and now thousands of people every year are paying the price. It may be too little, too late, but in recent years the government has been ramping up their asbestos legislation, both to try and ensure that victims of asbestos are compensated and that the flood of constant lawsuits is abated.
The hint that there would be any asbestos legislation was in the 1970s, when the government was working on the Black Lung Bill. Since then, a number of different programs have been proposed to help deal with the problems related to asbestos. Almost every year brings a new piece of potential asbestos legislation, and the issue remains a very heated one that is a focus of many groups, including the Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and many others. The trouble with asbestos legislation is finding a middle ground between the rights of the victims of asbestos exposure, and the rights of the level of liability of the companies responsible for exposing them.
The most recent piece of asbestos legislation to be proposed was the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act, also referred to as the Asbestos Trust Fund. The purpose of this program is to help to limit the amount of asbestos lawsuits that are filed each year – to date over 600,000 such lawsuits have been filed in the US. This would be accomplished by creating a multi-billion dollar fund that asbestos victims could be paid from. However, this program has faced some criticism because it has the potential to deny compensation to some people who legitimate claims for negligent asbestos exposure.
The government is still working on finding a perfect plan for asbestos legislation, and the issue has become a very divisive one. For the time being, it remains the right of every person who has suffered on account of exposure to asbestos to seek compensation for their suffering. In the future, asbestos legislation may remove or limit that right. So, if you are currently suffering from an asbestos related illness, now is the time to file a claim and receive compensation.
Posted: 07 May 2016 05:10 PM PDT
Asbestos Lawyer Mesothelioma - Having access to the right asbestos lawyer mesothelioma resources is vital if you have been diagnosed with having mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos. The first lawsuits that were lodged against manufacturers of asbestos were launched in 1929. Ever since then, there have been a wide variety of lawsuits that have been filed against the manufacturers of asbestos and employers that neglected to implement the necessary safety measures after links became known between asbestos and asbestosis and asbestos and mesothelioma. Some reports place this occurrence at around 1898, meaning that as far back as 1898 it was known that mesothelioma was caused by asbestos, and nothing was done.
Today you will see many commercials plugging asbestos lawyer mesothelioma law firms, asking if you or someone that you know was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a rare type of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos particles. Asbestos particles can be found in many different places including ship yards, lumber yards, heating industries and automotive industries as well. The liability that results from the sheer number of lawsuits and the sheer number of people being affected by mesothelioma has reached billions and billions of dollars so far. The method of allocating this compensation has been the source of a wide variety of court cases reaching as high as the United States Supreme Court, and many government attempts at resolution of both existing cases and future cases as well. Unfortunately, Congress has so far failed to enact a significant reform regarding the asbestos industry.
The first ever lawsuit against an asbestos manufacturer was in 1929, and the parties settled the lawsuit. As part of the lawsuit's agreement, the attorneys had to agree never to pursue a further case regarding asbestos. It was not until 1960 that mesothelioma was first established as a disease that rose from the exposure to asbestos. More than 30 case studies were referenced in the article, of people who had suffered in South Africa from mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure. Some of these exposures were transient, while others were mine workers. The first diagnosed case of malignant mesothelioma was in an Australian asbestos employee. The worker had worked in the asbestos mine mill between 1948 and 1950 in Wittenoom.
In this town of Wittenoom, mine waste containing asbestos was being used to cover playgrounds as well as school yards. A British Journal of Industrial Medicine article in 1965 established that people living in the vicinity of asbestos mines and factories were contracting mesothelioma even though they were not working in them. Despite proof that a number of diseases were being caused in relation to exposure to asbestos, the mining continued in Wittenoom until 1966, before the town of Wittenoom began to be phased out by the Australian government in 1978.
|You are subscribed to email updates from Mesothelioma. |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States|